Science

The Trump administration has started to pull the US out of the Paris climate agreement. Here's what that means and what comes next.

trump tree
Brigitte Macron, second from left, looks at an inscription on President Donald Trump's shovel as he and French President Emmanuel Macron participate in a tree planting ceremony at the White House in Washington, April 23, 2018. Andrew Harnik/AP
Read in app

On Monday afternoon, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the Trump administration had sent official notification to the United Nations that the US is withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement.

That makes the US — the world's second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases, behind China — the only nation to attempt to exit the landmark climate accord. Because of processes established in the agreement, the exit will formally take place in one year, on November 4, 2020. 

The Paris agreement, adopted on December 12, 2015, set international objectives to cut greenhouse-gas emissions in order to keep Earth's climate from warming more than 2 degrees Celsius by the year 2100.

In June 2017, President Donald Trump announced his intention to pull the US out of the agreement, suggesting that it "disadvantages the United States to the exclusive benefit of other countries."

But because the United Nations stipulated that no country that entered the agreement could exit for at least three years — and the accord didn't take effect until November 6, 2016 — Trump had to wait to take the promised action. This week, that process began. 

Here's what the withdrawal really entails, and what could happen next.

What is the Paris climate agreement?

Reuters paris agreement
President Donald Trump departs after announcing his decision that the United States will withdraw from the landmark Paris Climate Agreement, in the Rose Garden of the White House, June 1, 2017.  Reuters

The Paris climate agreement is non-binding, voluntary pledge by more than 200 countries to reduce carbon emissions. Each country submitted its own plan in pursuit of this goal, but there are no legal ramifications for member nations that fail to meet their promised emissions cuts. 

At the time, the US (under the Obama administration) pledged to cut its greenhouse-gas emissions to 26% below the 2005 level by the year 2025. Other countries committed to being carbon-neutral by 2050. Both the US' pledge and others were meant as baselines that would get ramped up over time.

However, a study by the non-profit Climate Action Tracker found that in aggregate, the Paris commitments fall woefully short; current pledges would result in a 3-degree-Celsius temperature increase.

Why does Trump want out?

Trump believes that the US' pledged emissions cuts put an "unfair economic burden" on American workers, businesses, and tax payers. 

The Trump administration also does not want the US to be beholden to an international agreement about emissions cuts. In his announcement about the Paris agreement on Monday, Pompeo noted that the nation's greenhouse-gas emissions dropped 13% between 2005 and 2017 — evidence that the US is already tackling climate change. 

Pompeo did not mention that US carbon emissions rose in 2018.

However, Andrew Steer, CEO of the World Resources Institute, said in a statement that the Trump administration is creating a false dichotomy between climate action and economic hardship.

"By withdrawing from the Paris agreement, the Trump administration is showing that it cares neither about science nor economics. It is driven by outdated views from the last century that held that climate action was costly and hurt jobs," Steer said.

This isn't the first time the Trump administration has worked to soften environmental regulations and commitments: The president also catalyzed rollbacks of the US Endangered Species Act and the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Water Act.

Could the US rejoin the agreement later?

According to a Yale survey, 69% of American voters (including 51% of Republicans) disapprove of Trump's decision to pull the US out of the Paris agreement.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has described the move as a "disastrous decision that sells out our children's future."

Once the US formally exits the agreement on November 4, 2020 (a one-year waiting period to exit is stipulated in the agreement rules), American leaders would still be permitted to attend future climate negotiations, but as observers only. The agreement requires that member nations come together every five years to set more ambitious targets.

However, every Democratic presidential candidate running in the 2020 election has pledged to re-join the Paris agreement.

FILE PHOTO: Democratic 2020 U.S. presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren speaks at a Democratic Party fundraising dinner, the Liberty and Justice Celebration, in Des Moines, Iowa, U.S. November 1, 2019.  REUTERS/Eric Thayer
Sen. Elizabeth Warren speaks at a Democratic Party fundraising dinner in Des Moines, Iowa on November 1, 2019.  Eric Thayer/Reuters

If one of those candidates wins the presidential election, the US would still formally withdraw from the agreement, since the one-year mark falls within Trump's presidential term. But a new president could re-join after taking office — it would only take 30 days for the US to re-enter the agreement after a new leader sends a request to the United Nations.

"Even if [Trump] follows through, it would take just 30 days for a new president to get us back in," former vice president Al Gore tweeted on Monday. "This decision is ultimately in the hands of the voters."

The executive branch of the European Union, which co-signed the Paris agreement, tweeted on Tuesday: "We regret the US notification to withdraw from the #Parisagreement. We worked side-by-side with our American friends to build the agreement in 2015 which is now in force. It is here to stay, its door remains open and we hope the US will decide to pass it again one day."

Read next

Aylin Woodward was formerly a senior science reporter at Insider, where she covered climate change, earth science, anthropology and human evolution, and space She also covered the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on coronavirus variants, genetic sequencing, virus origins, and long-term immunity.   Before joining Insider, her work appeared regularly in New Scientist and the San Jose Mercury News, with bylines in Scientific American, Science, and BuzzFeed News. She is a proud alumna of the UC Santa Cruz Science Communication program, and graduated in 2015 from Dartmouth College with degrees in biological anthropology and government. Aylin speaks Turkish, French, and Spanish. When not frantically meeting deadlines or interviewing sources, she can be found on the nearest roller derby track, or surfing the nearest beach. Additional Expertise Aylin also wrote about natural disasters, mass extinctions, and weird animal phenomena. She is well versed in archaeology, dinosaurs, and enjoys penning the occasional Hollywood science fiction debunk Her reporting also extended to the realm of running shoe technology, with a focus on the role of controversial Nike Vaporfly shoes in major marathon wins and milestones. She uncovered a trend among non-Nike sponsored runners covertly using Vaporflys Popular articles Anthony Fauci reveals which activities he will and won't do now that he's vaccinated — and indoor restaurants are still a no Decades ago, 9 Russian hikers mysteriously fled their tent and froze to death. A new study sheds light on the cold case. Earth tipped over on its side 84 million years ago and then righted itself, new study finds Mysterious brain injuries have plagued over 130 US spies and diplomats. Were they attacked with a microwave weapon? Nike's controversial Vaporfly shoes make runners faster — so runners sponsored by other brands are blacking them out to wear in secret